Wall Street Prison Consultants

Federal Bureau of Prisons Administrative Remedy Program

The Administrative Remedy Program in the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is a mechanism designed to allow inmates to seek formal review of an issue relating to any aspect of their confinement.

This program, outlined in BOP Program Statement 1330.18, is intended to address a wide range of issues, including medical treatment, staff misconduct, conditions of confinement, and other concerns that may arise during an inmate’s incarceration.

The process begins at an informal level, with the inmate attempting to resolve the issue with the staff member involved. If the issue remains unresolved, the inmate may then file a formal complaint (BP-9) with the Warden. If the Warden’s response is unsatisfactory, the inmate can appeal to the Regional Director (BP-10), and finally, to the Central Office (BP-11).

Criticism and Ineffectiveness

Despite its intention to provide a systematic approach to addressing inmate grievances, the Administrative Remedy Program has been criticized for its inefficacy. Critics argue that the program often fails to provide meaningful solutions to inmates’ concerns.

One of the main criticisms is that the process is slow, often taking months or even years to fully address a complaint. This delay can be especially problematic for time-sensitive issues, such as those relating to medical treatment.

Another criticism is that the program is often perceived as biased. Given that the initial stages of the process involve review by BOP staff, there is a concern that staff may be inclined to protect their colleagues or the institution, rather than adequately addressing the inmate’s grievance. This can result in a lack of impartiality and fairness, which can further discourage inmates from using the program.

Alleged Stonewalling and Delay Tactics

There are also allegations that BOP staff sometimes employ tactics to stonewall or delay the resolution of inmates’ issues. These tactics can include misplacing or not responding to complaints, discouraging inmates from filing complaints, or retaliating against those who do.

Moreover, the program’s multi-tiered structure can be leveraged to delay resolutions. For example, responses at each level are not required until the last day of the response time, which can lengthen the time it takes for a complaint to reach the Central Office level, the final stage of the process.

In conclusion, while the BOP Administrative Remedy Program is intended to address inmate grievances in a systematic way, criticisms regarding its efficiency, perceived bias, and potential stonewalling tactics often challenge its effectiveness. For meaningful reform, these issues need to be addressed with transparency, timeliness, and a commitment to impartiality.

Scroll to Top